Con Man Essay Example for Free

Con Man EssayThis is covered under clause 29, which covers the Revision of assignment of consequence of the exteriorise. Under clause 29 the JBCC lists events where the avower is entitled to a revision of date practical finish but is non due compensation and those that the startor is due compensation, in the case of the JBCC, the value of the contract or bulge will not change as a result of the listed event. All though this is the case, some of the events listed under clause 29. 1 are covered in section 6, but have different consequences. maven such issue is how the different contracts deal with unfortunate hold effects on works during construction period.While the necrotizing enterocolitis contract states the effects of weather on the works as a compensation event under clause 60. 1. 13, where a weather measurement is recorded during a calendar month, forwards the completion date for the whole of works and at the place stated in the contract data, the weather even t must occur less oft than once in ten years to be a compensation event. This could mean that should this occur the contractor is due compensation for any costs incurred and a revision of completion time. While the JBCC deals with weather in a different way. In clause 29. states the circumstances where the contractor is entitled to a revision of the completion date but where the leading instrument shall not adjust the contract value, are the delays to practical completion caused by various events. One such event, stated in clause 29. 1. 1 is the adverse effects of weather conditions. This implies that the contractor can not claim for adjustment to contract value due to adverse weather conditions like in the NEC contract. This is one less compensation event that will need to be budgeted for under the JBCC agreement. Another difference in this is under clause 60. 9 of the NEC contract which covers events neither party could account for or prevent which stops the contractor continui ng works and is not one of the stated compensation events. While this is covered in the JBCC under clause 29. 1. 4 as an event that neither party could prevent also, it solely allows the contractor a revision of date of completion without a revaluation of the project. The JBCC recognizes some events as requiring compensation and others not, while the NEC all the events are seen as compensation events which will require the employer to pay the contractor more(prenominal) money.In regards to the communication of such events occurring the NEC gives the contractor considerably more time to promulgate the witness Manager of the possibility of the compensation event occurring. This is stated under clause 61. 3 which gives the contractor a maximum of eight weeks to herald the Project Manager of the event, failing to do so will mean that the contractor will not be entitled to change prices or the completion date. This is save if the Project Manager failed to notify the contractor of th e event, if it was the responsibility of the Project Manager to do so.While in the JBCC also allows for a time period, which gives the contractor more time to claim compensation if any of the events occur that are listed in clause 29. 1 to 29. 3. Under clause 29. 4. 1-3, the contract states that the contractor must notify the principal agent within 20 days of becoming aware of the event and must take all steps to try and avoid it. there is also a 40 day period after which the event has occurred, within which the contractor must alert the principal agent of it occurring or fall asleep out on being able to claim for compensation. This is stated under clause 29. 5 of the contract.In both contracts these claims are submitted to the project manager, in the NEC and to the principal agent in the JBCC. These claims are investigated by the employers agents, clause 61. 4 in the NEC, states that the project manager must decide whether the event occurred as a result of actions taken by the co ntractor, or has not happened or is not expected to happen, has no effect upon the defined cost or completion date and is not one of the listed compensation events, the project manager may decide that the contractor has no grounds for his claim and get across the contractor compensation.If the project manger does decide that there are grounds for the claim he notifies the contractor to submit a quotations for the claim. Should the project manager fail to reply the contractor within a week or a longer time period that is agreed upon by both parties, then the claim is viewed to have been received by the project manager. The contractor is the free to submit quotations for the claim. While in the JBCC the process is similar, and is covered under clause 29. which gives the principal agent 15 working(a) days of receiving the claim to grant or refuse the working days claimed or revaluation of contract value depending on the basis of the claim. During which time the principal agent shall determine the revised date of practical completion and identify each circumstance and relevant sub-clause and for each event grant or deny the contractors claim. The principal agent must also supply reasons for the decisions he or she has made. But while in the NEC no response by the project manager, the claim is deemed to have been accepted, in the JBCC it is assumed that the claim has been rejected.This is sated under clause 29. 8, which provides certain cover for the employer should there be a mishap and the principal agent is unable to reply the contractor, unlike in the NEC. In essence the JBCC contract is the better contract on managing the cost of the project along with time constraints. The contract clearly states the events which if they do occur, will require revision of the date of practical completion and also which events will require both a revision of the date and revaluation of the project.While under the NEC contract the events listed are events that can all be cla imed for money by the contractor, which may lead to the employer having to set deflexion a greater budget for contingencies because of the number of items listed that can be claimed as a compensation event. The better contract that would ease the clients worries or so budget and time constraints is the JBCC principal agreement. References 1. JBCC Series 2000 Principal Building Agreement Edition 5. 0 2. NEC Engineering and Construction Contract

An analysis of “The Flea” by John Donne

An analysis of The Flea by tin can DonneClose ReadingThis close reading, is an analysis of The Flea by John Donne. The Flea is a love sonnet that uses a flea as a reason for the writer and the char woman to get together. The flea is the main image of the poem, through which all of the metaphors and puns atomic number 18 woven around. When it comes down to it, the poem is some trying to get the woman in the poem into bed. The writer never comes out and just says that he wants to gain sex with the woman, but that is exactly what a marriage bed is for. He does not want to sc atomic number 18 her off with the blunt truth that having sex with him would be a terrible mistake. This close reading will demonstrate all of this and much by going through the poem parentage by line looking deeply into what each line is saying and how it is demonstrating it.In the first stanza, Donne uses extended metaphors to get his point across about the flea. The first stanza speaks of how the writer an d the woman become one after being bitten by the flea. This stanza begins with Mark but this flea, and mark in this, which directs the attention of the woman towards the flea. He uses an apostrophe by speaking to a person outside the poem who cannot respond. How little that which thou deniest me is, she denies his sexual advances which means little to her. It sucked me first, and now sucks thee, And in this flea, our two line of merchandises mingled be, the flea bites them both causing their blood to swagger together inside the flea. Blood is used both literally and figuratively throughout the poem, which makes it a pun. Literally, that flea really does contain two peoples blood. Metaphorically, when two people manifold we call it mixing fluids, and the writer plays with this double meaning. The mixing of the blood cannot be a sin, or shame, or lose of virginity indeed neither should it be for their separate bodily to mix together, A sin, nor shame, nor loss of maidenhead.Yet t his enjoys before it woo, the pleasure of the flea is a pun. The flea literally enjoys her blood, however to the writer, it also enjoys her in the erotic way resembling he wants to. And pampered swells with one blood made of two, the flea is lucky to be filled with their blood. This flea becomes larger in size with blood from both subjects. The flea has joined them together already by mixing their blood together which is more than he is asking of the woman, And this, alas, is more than we would do. The writer expresses shame and sadness for this flea. He speaks of the flea like it has sinned in its blood sucking ways which is more than he is asking the woman to do so they should just have sex.The act of the biting flea happens prior to seduction it accents the close of gratification prior to the procreative stimulation indicated by woo, pampered, and swells. Hence, the poem changes its gesture of passion and focuses on the sexual pleasure, following a notable order solicitation, s welling, copulation, wherefore fulfillment. The flea, particularly enjoys the pleasure of sucking both male and female bodies. As a result of, the outburst alas, the writer regretfully indicates the flea can do more than he can do.In the second stanza, the writer asks his woman, Oh stay, third lives in one flea spare, as the woman moves in to kill the flea, he asks her to halt from the killing. The writer explains to the woman if she would please reserve the three lives which are now mixed inside in the flea. The writer may be concluding that the three lives within the flea represent a father, mother, and baby. He constructs another analogy in this line, Where we almost, yea more than married are. In this he argues, their blood is mixed within the flea therefore they are no more than married. This flea is you and I, the flea has both of their blood inside it. Our marriage bed, and marriage temple, the flea is their sex and religion. Also, their supposed marriage is an extended me taphor which stems from the pun on two kinds of blood literal blood and family relations. Mixing of bloodlines is what happens when you get married.The writer confesses Though parents grudge, and you, ware met. In spite of the fact that their parents object is not a reason for them not to have sex. He is suggesting that even though they cannot be in a romantic relationship, it should not affect her decision not to make love, And cloistered in these living walls of jet. Although their parents protest with resentment towards their romance, and she will not make love to him, contained within the flea is a place of religious solitude, where they are united as one. The writer extends the metaphor further by saying neither of their parents would approve of the union. The flea is compared to a church or cloister with black walls, in which the marriage ceremony takes place.Donne writes, Though use make you apt to kill me, even though you are almost certainly going to kill me. let not to tha t, self-murder added be, he requests that she not kill the flea because she would be killing herself, the flea, and him. And sacrilege, three sin in killing three, and by killing the writer, the flea, and herself, she will commit three sins of theft and perverting what is sanctified. Since the flea is a temple of religion, should she kill this flea? Returning to the metaphor, the flea contains their lives, the writer alleges her of trying to commit a deadly sin by killing the flea. She would be killing him and committing suicide herself. Furthermore, she would defile the institution of marriage, by killing the marriage temple.In the final stanza, Cruel and sudden, hast thou since, the writer calls the woman sadistic and rash in her actions to kill the flea without thinking. The regard to the woman as cruel means she is likely to take pleasure in the fleas pain. The writer has redefined the flea. The flea has become a motion picture of his own pain which he has endured because of he r prohibition of sex. Through her prohibition she has been lacking of affection or sympathy. Alike the flea, she has behaved towards him lacking pause in denying him the gratifications of sex.The writer speaks to the woman through rhetorical questions, Purpled thy nail, in blood of innocence, has she sinned by spilling the blood of the innocent? Has she damned herself to hell by persecuting the flea? Oh, no She kills the flea, but the magnificent rhetoric about the blood of innocence compares with the insignificance of a dot of blood on her fingernail. Wherein could this flea guilty be, except in that drop which it sucked from thee? What could the flea have done so badly, except sucking a little drop of blood from them?Yet thou triumphst and sayst that thou/ Findst not thy self, nor me the weaker now. The woman retaliates, celebrating her success in killing the flea, makes neither him, nor her any less noble. The writer responds, Tis true, then learn how false, fears be it is true, and learn how false your fears are. False fears is an example of alliteration which highlights her concern about the losing her innocence. The writer closes with, vindicatory so much honor, when you yieldst to me. Will waste, as this fleas death took sustenance from thee. When she surrenders to him, she will lose no more integrity than when she killed the flea. Yieldst is a secondary pun. The writer wants the woman to yield to his twisted rationality of his argument. He also wants her to yield to him sexually. He also uses a simile which associates the conservation of her own life when the flea dies to the conservation of her honor after she gives him what he wants. .